News, insight and advice to keep you informed.
IRS Announces New Online Tools to Help Taxpayers Manage Child Tax Credit Payments
The IRS has announced the launch of two new online tools to help families verify, manage and monitor monthly payments of child tax credits under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARP) (P.L. 117-2). These are in addition to the Non-filer Sign-up tool announced last week, which helps families register for child tax credits. The tools are both available through the Update Portal at https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/child-tax-credit-update-portal.
The Treasury and IRS have urged taxpayers to use a special online tool to determine eligibility for the Child Tax Credit (CTC) and the special monthly advance payments beginning on July 15. The new CTC Eligibility Assistant is interactive and easy to use. It is particularly useful to those who do not normally file a federal tax return and have not yet filed either a 2019 or 2020 return.
“This new tool provides an important first step to help people understand if they qualify for the CTC, which is especially important for those who don’t normally file a tax return,” said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. “The eligibility assistant works in concert with other features on IRS.gov to help people receive this important credit. The IRS is working hard to deliver the expanded Child Tax Credit, and we will be rolling out additional help for taxpayers in the near future. Where possible, please help us help others by distributing CTC information in your communities,” he added.
The CTC Eligibility Assistant does not request any personally-identifiable information for any family member. The tool can be found at https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/advance-child-tax-credit-eligibility-assistant.
In addition to verification of their eligibility, the Update Portal allows a taxpayer to unenroll from receiving monthly payments, in order to receive a lump sum. The tool can be found at https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/advance-child-tax-credit-payments-in-2021. The unenroll feature is helpful to families that no longer qualify for the child tax credit or believe they will not qualify when they file their 2021 return. This could happen if:
- their income in 2021 is too high to qualify for the credit;
- someone else (an ex-spouse or another family member, for example) qualifies to claim their child or children as dependents in 2021; or
- their main home was outside of the United States for more than half of 2021.
Further, future versions and new features of the tool are planned for the summer and fall. These updates will allow taxpayers to view their payment history, adjust bank account information or mailing addresses. In general, these payments will go to families who:
- filed either a 2019 or 2020 federal income tax return;
- used the Non-Filers tool register for an Economic Impact Payment; or
- registered for the advance child tax credit using the new Non-filer Sign-up tool.
Next, eligible families will receive advance payments, either by direct deposit or check. Each payment will be up to $300 per month for each child under age six and up to $250 per month for each child ages six through 17. Filing soon will ensure that the IRS has taxpayers’ most current bank account information and key details about qualifying family members. This includes individuals who do not normally file tax returns, including families experiencing homelessness and individuals in undeserved groups.
The IRS also announced pertinent child tax credit changes. The ARP raised the maximum child tax credit to $3,600 for children under the age of six and to $3,000 per child for children ages six through 17. Finally, the IRS urged community groups, non-profits, associations, education organizations and taxpayers with connections to individuals with children to share this critical information about the child tax credit as well as other important benefits.
IRS Issues Proposed Electronic Filing Requirements for Specified Returns and Other Documents
The IRS has proposed regulations that would amend the rules for filing electronically and affects persons required to file partnership returns, corporate income tax returns, unrelated business income tax returns, withholding tax returns, certain information returns, registration statements, disclosure statements, notifications, actuarial reports, and certain excise tax returns.
The proposed amendments reflect changes made by the Taxpayer First Act of 2019 (TFA), P.L. 116-25, and are consistent with the TFA’s emphasis on increasing electronic filing.
The IRS is also withdrawing proposed regulations ( REG-102951-16) published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2018, that would amend the rules for determining whether information returns must be filed electronically.
Electronic Filing
Amendments are proposed to:
- income tax regulations under Code Secs. 1461 and 1474, which provide that persons required to deduct and withhold tax are liable for such tax; and Code Sec. 6050I, which requires persons to report information about financial transactions to the IRS;
- pension excise tax regulations under Code Sec. 6011, which require persons to report information for certain excise taxes related to employee benefit plans;
- regulations under Code Secs. 1474, 6011, 6012, 6033, 6057, 6058, and 6059, for determining whether returns must be filed using magnetic media; and
- regulations under Code Sec. 6011 to remove the option available to a person required to report certain excise taxes on Form 4720, Return of Certain Excise Taxes Under Chapters 41 and 42 of the Internal Revenue Code, to designate a Form 4720 filed by a private foundation or trust as that person’s return if the foundation is reporting the same transaction.
Under Code Sec. 6011(e) and related regulations, filers are already required to file returns and statements electronically if, during a calendar year, they are required to file 250 or more returns. Eight related proposed rules would lower the 250-return threshold as authorized by Code Sec. 6011(e), as amended by section 2301 of the TFA. A filer can request that the IRS waive the electronic-filing requirement if the filer’s cost to comply with the rule would cause a financial hardship, and the IRS routinely grants meritorious hardship waiver requests.
Under Code Sec. 6050I and related regulations, filers are required to file Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business, if, in the course of their trade or business, they receive more than $10,000 in cash in one transaction or in two or more related transactions. The related proposed rule would require filers of Forms 8300 to file those forms electronically if such filers are also required to file returns electronically under Reg. §§301.6011-2(b)(1) and (2). The Treasury Department and the IRS expect filers of Form 8300 to use FinCEN’s BSA E-Filing System, which is free, requiring only an internet connection.
Under Code Sec. 6011(e)(4) and related regulations, financial institutions defined in Code Sec. 1471(d)(5) already are required to electronically file Forms 1042-S, Foreign Person’s U.S. Source Income Subject to Withholding. The related proposed rule would extend this filing requirement to Forms 1042, Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of Foreign Persons, filed by the same financial institutions.
Under Code Sec. 6011(h), as amended by section 3101 of the TFA, organizations required to file annual returns relating to any tax imposed by Code Sec. 511 must file those returns in electronic form. A proposed regulation implements this statutory requirement.
Under Code Sec. 6033(n), as amended by section 3101 of the TFA, organizations required to file returns under Code Sec. 6033 must file those returns in electronic form. Proposed regulations implement this statutory requirement.
Seven proposed regulations would require electronic filing for certain returns not currently required to be filed electronically. Because electronic filing has become more common, accessible, and economical, the economic impact of these proposed rules on small entities is expected be insignificant. If the cost to comply with these electronic-filing requirements would cause a financial hardship, an entity may request a waiver, and the IRS routinely grants meritorious hardship waiver requests.
Comments Requested
The proposed rules are scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2021, and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-15615, and on govinfo.gov. Written or electronic comments must be received by September 21, 2021, the date that is 60 days after the date the proposed rules are published in the Federal Register. Comments may be submitted electronically at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-102951-16), or by mail.
The public hearing is being held by teleconference on September 22, 2021, at 10 a.m. EST. Requests to speak and outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing must be received by September 21, 2021. If no outlines are received by that date, the public hearing will be cancelled. Requests to attend the public hearing must be received by 5:00 p.m. EST on September 20, 2021.
Marriage Was Valid for Estate Tax Purposes
An estate was allowed a marital deduction because the decedent’s marriage was valid in the country of celebration. The decedent, who was Jewish, obtained a religious divorce under rabbinical law in New York from his first wife after a New York court had declared his Mexican divorce invalid, which resulted in the declaration that his marriage to a second wife was null and void. The decedent traveled to Israel and married his third wife in an Orthodox Jewish ceremony. The Israeli marriage certificate noted that the decedent was free to marry because he was divorced. The government claimed that because the divorce was not valid under state law, no marital deduction was allowed because the property did not pass to the decedent’s surviving spouse.
Marriage Was Valid in New York
Under New York law, the marriage was valid since it was recognized in Israel unless it was contrary to public policy or violated “positive law.” Because Code Sec. 2056(a) focuses on the identity of the surviving spouse, the initial question was whether the decedent and the surviving spouse were validly married, and not whether the religious divorce was valid. Under Israeli law, the decedent was validly divorced and could remarry. Thus, for purposes of New York law, the marriage was not bigamous and not contrary to public policy. New York divorce law was not violated by the finding because that law was not broken by a New York resident marrying outside of the state and recognizing a non-New York marriage was not equivalent to ruling on the divorce’s validity. However, the ruling was narrowly focused on whether the New York Court of Appeals would recognize the Israeli marriage, which was not contested by the prior spouse and left undisturbed by the lower courts.